Today I came across a youth recreational basketball league that required parents to read the National Standards for Youth Sports as part of signing their child up for the league. I was a little embarrassed with myself that I was not familiar with these national standards. What kind of youth recreational sports enthusiast am I, right?
So, I did what we all do when we are trying to find information – I Google’d it. Turns out I am familiar with the organization that put the standards together – the National Association for Youth Sports (NAYS). NAYS has been around since 1981 and espouses to be “America’s leading advocate for positive and safe sports for children“. I have followed them on Twitter (@NAYS_edu) for a while and appreciate their content and efforts to provide positive youth recreational sports experiences.
After reviewing the standards, I have the following analysis/commentary: the standards provide welcome guidance for adults – and the children themselves – for ensuring a positive experience; and are very much in line with my Hustle & Attitude philosophy. I think leagues and individuals that adhere to these standards would be well on their way to giving children a fun, safe, and positive sports experience. My specific thoughts on the standards include:
- The age-specific recommendations in Standard #1 seem appropriate; particularly those that recognize different development levels based on age
- I completely agree with the recommendation for training of adults involved in youth recreational sports; I believe that coaches are the most in need of training – and I will be giving my first Hustle & Attitude coaching clinic in December
- One of the most important things our children can learn from their youth recreational sports experiences is good sportsmanship – the essence of Standard #6
- My wife pointed out that the recommendations concerning first-aid certification and CPR qualified personnel being present at all times in Standard #7 are really good; but what responsibility does the league have to provide these resources?
The ‘Equal Play Opportunity’ standard is perhaps my favorite. As I mention in the ‘About’ page, providing equal opportunities for all children to participate in sports is one of the things I am most passionate about. To me, non-discrimination goes without saying, but the implementation items #2, #4, and #5 are the ones that most speak to me. I will have more to say later about how wrong it is that finances would keep a child from playing sports – money should not be an impediment. A key tenet of the Hustle & Attitude philosophy is to provide equal playing time for all participants. And, I have had the privilege of coaching children who were not necessarily diagnosed with a disability, but were developmentally challenged. I call it a privilege because the relationships have been some of the most rewarding in my youth recreational sports coaching career (I believe the feeling is mutual for the children, too).
Overall, I think the National Standards for Youth Sports are a valuable tool in the effort to continue to provide positive youth recreational sports experiences. My Hustle & Attitude philosophy and the practical application is in line with these standards and amplifies many of them.
Charles Pierce has a stunning piece on Grantland about the death of Evan Murray. His commentary about how “Evan is dead because he played American football” is an in your face, blunt and frank assessment of the state of high school football in America. His suggestion that nobody should play football until they are at least 21, as outrageous as it might seem at first blush, merits consideration. As I said in my previous post about youth football, I recommend flag football as an alternative before high school. But, as Pierce points out, 13 high school football players have died from injuries between 2012 and 2014. Recently, while a spectator at a high school football game, I cheered loudly and enthusiastically when our team’s cornerback ‘blew up’ the opposing team’s wide receiver. The hit was hard enough to knock the receiver’s helmet off and the receiver remained on the ground for several minutes before being helped off the field. I found Pierce’s comments about the fans cheering the hits that led to the deaths of the three players mentioned in his piece very convicting…what if the hit I cheered so loudly had resulted in serious injury or death? How would I feel about watching football, then? Perhaps high school is too early for tackle football. Or, perhaps it is time for a national conversation about ‘American football’. Pierce refers to Teddy Roosevelt’s role in bringing about standard rules and policies governing the sport to make it safer. I don’t know the answer. But, I think it’s time we all have the discussion.
Most of my posts (that is to say the other three) are researched and put together over several days, but I am reacting to yesterday evening’s edition of ESPN’s Pardon the Interruption (PTI). I really enjoy watching Mike Wilbon and Tony Kornheiser’s witty banter and reasoned discussion of the issues of the day in sports. And, as I was ending my week, I settled in to see what they had to say. I only saw the first 10 minutes of the episode (you can download the podcast of the episode) and found a couple of interesting items with respect to youth sports.
First was a discussion of the finding that 87 of 91 former NFL players who donated their brains to science after death tested positive for a brain disease. Wilbon rightfully asked “What does this mean for future generations of parents?” A question I discussed in detail in my previous post: Should My Son Play Youth Tackle Football? I appreciated Kornheiser’s push for restraint with respect to jumping to conclusions like this is “the end of football”. In an example of the reasoned discussion typical on the show, he asked questions about conclusions that should be derived from this sample set.
Then was the story about the two football players who assaulted a referee in a game (make no bones about it – what they did was assault). On Good Morning America, they claimed that they were instructed to do so by their coach. Again, the discussion was relevant and reasoned. Wilbon said: “Kids do follow the orders of the person they call coach”. I appreciate his point about how important coaches are to our kids. Kornheiser then suggested that real courage in this situation – while admitting that he doesn’t know if he would have been able to do it himself – would have been the kids recognizing the demand was wrong and saying “no”.
My takeaways: the sport of football is at an inflection point with the continued discussion about the risks of concussions (upcoming Will Smith movie) and everyone should all be cognizant of the crucial role our kids’ coaches play in helping shape them as young people.